IBM has stated that for their Deskstar 120GXP series hard drives, the "hours of operation" per day is limited to 1/3 of the day, or 8 hours. Think that's silly? Me too.

Maybe it's just me, but I leave my computer on all 24/7. While some argue that it's better to turn your computer on/off, there's been no definitive answer that I've seen. The fact that IBM has said not to have their hard drives powered for more than 8 hours per day isn't really all the disconcerting to me though, as I am rarely on my computer for terribly long (this semester ), and I just let the hard drive power down anyway.

Thoughts?

__________________
paul@pleaseohpleasedontspamme.slcentral.com
A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems -- P. Erdos

IBM's quality in their hard drives just seems to keep going down, which is disappointing to me because I've owned numerous IBM drives and love them to death. Obviously they're not out yet, but I would hate to see it come down to Maxtor, Seagate, and Western Digital as the only big players.

__________________
Aaron Dahlen - Gaming Editor
aaron@slcentral.com
SLCentral - Your logical choice for computing and technology
http://www.slcentral.com

Athlon XP 1800+ ... K7V DRAGON Plus ... 256 MB PC2100 ... GeForce3 PowerPack !!! ... Sound Blaster Audigy ... IBM 60GXP 40 GB ... Samsung SyncMaster 950p ... Windows XP Home

I don't understand what it is with IBM these days.

I own two IBM Deskstar 75GXP drives, a 14.4GB and a 45GB model. Both are 7200rpm models, at the top of the heap when released. Both are running in the same box, one on top of the other. Both have been run in my system for over a year, pretty much 24/7 (the 14.4 has probably been over two years now). While the 45GB model might have been among the production models that people are suing over, neither of these two drives has ever failed.

IBM had such a rep that when I was a reseller, we only used two manufacturers of drives for workstations (we used Seagate Cheetahs for servers) --IBM and Western Digital, and IBM was what we sold a customer when they wanted the best and nothing but. Ever since their early 1.7GB Deskstars, which in the day were top of the heap, they ruled the roost.

Now it seems they're really shooting themselves in the foot. Last fall I called to get a drive RMA'ed for a customer, and was told "I'd be lucky to see a replacement within 20 days". Forgive me, but this isn't acceptable. Western Digital and Maxtor still offer advance replacements, and IBM couldn't guarantee me anything. I advised the tech. rep that although I knew he wasn't responsible, I'd be switching customers over to another manufacturer until they could get their act together. Now IBM is telling us that their current line of high-end drives shouldn't be on more than 8 hours a day. I'm quite sure that my next hard disk purchase will be one of the 8MB buffer Western Digital models instead. When I buy a disk drive, I expect performance, reliability, and 3 year warranty with prompt service. I'm willing to pay money for this, and it looks like IBM will be losing mine.

I completely agree with Lonewolf.

I have two 30GB 75GXP drives as well that are on almost 24 hours a day. They have run on top of each other as well for some time, and I've had the drives for over a year. I haven't had any issues with them yet, but I've heard some pretty horrible stories.

IBM is really shooting themsleves in the foot with this one, and to say that the drives should only be on 8 hours a day....well if that's the case.....I would never purchase an IBM drive.

__________________
ActiveTuning - Partner & Director Of Sales & Marketing