|
SL Newsletter
|
| Recieve bi-weekly updates on news, new articles, and more |
|
|
|
|

06-12-01, 07:15 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1
|
|
Windows XP
Windows XP will be available in October. Will most Windows 9X programs run on XP?
|

06-13-01, 04:17 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Fort Knox, KY
Posts: 541
|
|
Without getting into a long post to answer your question.
Generally speaking, yes, most of the newer WIN98 programs will
run on XP.
However, games maybe something different, unless the
maker posts patches or updates for OS XP.
__________________
Serious Soldier
|

06-13-01, 08:52 AM
|
 |
Dancing Hero
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Over there
Posts: 1,163
|
|
A summary of my brief results so far...
System Shock 2 unpatched fails, but Windows XP posts a notice about this when you try to launch it. Shock2 doesn't work in NT, but it does run in Win2K if you force it to install.
Starcraft worked perfectly in XP. Of course, it, and other Blizzard games, have never had a problem with NT/2K/XP.
Worms Armageddon works in XP, even though it does not in Win2K or in WinNT. This seems to be the most promising result so far.
I haven't tried Pitfall - The Mayan Adventure yet, but I was gonna use that one next to see just *how* ancient of Windows apps XP would handle.
More results as I find them.
__________________
"And knowing is half the battle!"
|

06-22-01, 08:00 AM
|
 |
Free agent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by frickin' idiots.
Posts: 600
|
|
I was under the impression that XP only choked on old DOS run apps. Is this true?
|

06-22-01, 08:06 AM
|
 |
Dancing Hero
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Over there
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rob
I was under the impression that XP only choked on old DOS run apps. Is this true?
|
Haven't tried yet. Just been too busy, plus I only have it installed at work. What apps specifically are you looking for? I'll see what I can try.
__________________
"And knowing is half the battle!"
|

06-22-01, 08:24 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Fort Knox, KY
Posts: 541
|
|
One thing I did read today; Microsoft says that in order to upgrade you will need to have Windows Me or Windows 2000.
You won't be able to upgrade from windows 98. 
__________________
Serious Soldier
|

06-22-01, 08:25 AM
|
 |
Dancing Hero
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Over there
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by rstarr
One thing I did read today; Microsoft says that in order to upgrade you will need to have Windows Me or Windows 2000.
You won't be able to upgrade from windows 98.
|
Really? First I heard of this. It's newsworthy. Got a source?
__________________
"And knowing is half the battle!"
|

06-22-01, 08:32 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Fort Knox, KY
Posts: 541
|
|
I believe it came from a ZDnet newletter which I've already
deleted. Sorry. If I find the site again. I'll repost.
update:
Here is the article:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/n...2778701,00.html
From the article:
Quote:
|
A Windows XP Ready PC must be preinstalled with the Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional or the Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition operating system and have at least 128MB of RAM.
|
__________________
Serious Soldier
Last edited by rstarr : 06-22-01 at 08:37 AM.
|

06-23-01, 08:54 PM
|
 |
Free agent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by frickin' idiots.
Posts: 600
|
|
Did you also see the specs? You need like 1.2Gb free and 128Mb of ram just to install it. Granted I have enough space to park a bus on my hard drive but still why do we need to have all of this code?
I also read that you can not upgrade from plain ol' Win98 though I can't imagine why. WinME has the same underlying code as Win98 so how can it tell?
|

06-23-01, 09:06 PM
|
 |
Student-for-life
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 1,294
|
|
Type in "ver" in a dos box. It's pretty easy to know what OS you're running, and it's a great way to make money. A damn shifty, sly, stupid way, but that hasn't ever stopped MS before.
They could claim that it is due to compatability issues, but common', it's not like we'd notice a blue screen of death occuring because of that, or just normal usage....
|

06-23-01, 09:12 PM
|
 |
Free agent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by frickin' idiots.
Posts: 600
|
|
Piece of cake. Type SETVER 5.0 (thats WinMe right?) 
|

06-23-01, 09:24 PM
|
 |
Student-for-life
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 1,294
|
|
Interesting...I'm gonna have to toy with that 
|

06-23-01, 10:48 PM
|
 |
Dancing Hero
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Over there
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rob
Piece of cake. Type SETVER 5.0 (thats WinMe right?)
|
Actually, if it's Win9X of anything, it'd be 4.9X.XXXX. I don't have WinME installed anywhere around here to tell.
And I'm 99.9% sure that WinME and the other upgrade products check for about 12 files in the installation/media to verify that it's legit. And they check the contents of the files, not just to see if they're present. That's how it does some of its version checking.
__________________
"And knowing is half the battle!"
|

06-24-01, 07:39 AM
|
 |
Free agent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by frickin' idiots.
Posts: 600
|
|
I was just kidding! 
|

07-30-01, 09:27 AM
|
 |
Dancing Hero
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Over there
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Re: A summary of my brief results so far...
Quote:
Originally posted by Cutriss
System Shock 2 unpatched fails, but Windows XP posts a notice about this when you try to launch it. Shock2 doesn't work in NT, but it does run in Win2K if you force it to install.
|
I was playing this the other day on a Win2K laptop, and it wouldn't run if I didn't install the patch. It might be broken because of SafeDisc protection. Installing the patch helps to remedy this situation...so it's possible that installing the patch for System Shock 2 might alleviate the SafeDisc protection.
It should be noted that Diablo 2 runs in XP, and it uses SafeDisc, so it's quite likely that this may not be the issue at hand.
__________________
"And knowing is half the battle!"
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 AM.
Hardware
Reviews, Articles, News, All Reviews...
|
Gaming
Reviews, Articles, News...
|
 |
|
|
Regular Sections
A Guru's World, CPU/Memory Watch, SLDeals...
|
 |
SLBoards
Forums, Register(Free), Todays Discussions...
|
Site Info
Search, About Us, Advertise...
|
 |
|