SLCentral - Your logical choice for computing and technology
Latest Deals   
Navigation
  • Home
  • Search
  • Forums
  • Hardware
  • Games
  • Tech News
  • Deals
  • Prices
  • A Guru's World
  • CPU/Memory Watch
  • Site Info
  • SL Newsletter
    Recieve bi-weekly updates on news, new articles, and more


    Forum home My SLBoards (Control Panel)View the calendar View the members list Read the FAQ Search the forums

    Go Back   SLCentral Forum > Technology > Software / Operating Systems
    User Name
    Password


    Reply
     
    Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
      #1  
    Old 11-19-01, 05:10 AM
    Shanz's Avatar
    Shanz Shanz is offline
    Registered User
     
    Join Date: Nov 2001
    Posts: 2
    Shanz is off the scale
    Unhappy Strange Windows 98 / Linux behaviour

    I faced a small problem / strange Windows behaviour while putting up a Win98SE, WinNT4, RH7.1 triple boot. It is regarding the filesystem type of the extended partition. I'll describe the whole procedure to you. By and large I followed the instructions from the multiboot document at "http://math.uwb.edu.pl/~mariusz/multiboot/" . Single Hard Disk : Windows98, NT, Solaris, Linux.

    I had a 40GB HDD (IDE). I wanted to keep a layout as follows :

    2GB (primary) WinNT
    5GB (primay) Win98
    512MB (primary) Linux /boot
    Extended ----
    512MB (logical) Linux swap
    6GB (logical) Linux /
    2GB (logical) FAT (for transferring files from one OS to another)
    6GB (logical) FAT32
    6GB (logical) FAT32
    rest (logical) FAT32

    I began with a clean disk. Made boot floppies of Windows98, NT 4.0 Server.
    Booted with Win98 boot disk. Did fdisk /mbr. Created a FAT partition of 2GB. Rebooted. formatted the partition. Installed a bootmanager .. osloader2000 (www.osloader.com) which allows one to hide partitions. hid the partition created.
    Rebooted with Win98 boot disk. created a FAT32 partition of 5GB. Rebooted. formatted the partition. Now installed win98 onto this 2nd partition, while the 1st partition was hidden. This is because, win98 seems to want to sit on the first available partition (otherwise, it warns that it found another partition and wants to remove those files during setup).
    Rebooted. hid the win98 partition (2nd one) this time. and unhid the 1st partition. Installed winNT on this partition. Shutdown.
    Booted machine with RHL 7.1 CD1 and created /boot (primary) partition using Linux fdisk. Created an extended partition on the remaining space. within it created logical volumes for Linux SWAP, Linux /, FAT, FAT32. Installed Linux.

    Here comes the problem part ..

    Now, when I start up, all 3 OS work fine. but windows seems to have confusion recognizing the logical volumes properly. Windows Explorer reports the same FAT32 partition twice as 2 different drives!!!

    So, i go back to the old thumbrule : use the fdisk utility of the OS that is to read the drives. So, I went to Linux fdisk and deleted the FAT and FAT32 logical volumes. Changed the extended partition type from 5 to f (win95 FAT LBA).

    Booted with win98 bootdisk and created the logical partitions using windows fdisk. Now, when I try to boot with Linux, it gives an error. but if I use Linux fdisk again to change the extended partition type from f to 5, Linux works fine. How do I get around this problem? Having to change the partition type before having to boot into an OS is pathetically cumbersome.

    Looking forward to ur advice.
    Reply With Quote
      #2  
    Old 11-21-01, 01:15 PM
    rstarr's Avatar
    rstarr rstarr is offline
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: May 2001
    Location: Fort Knox, KY
    Posts: 541
    rstarr is off the scale
    Default

    Are you hiding each OS from each other when you boot up?

    Windows don't always recongize Linux installations as a usuable area. Maybe you should hide the Linux installation from Windows and see if that cures your problem.
    Reply With Quote
      #3  
    Old 12-01-01, 02:30 AM
    Unregistered
    Guest
     
    Posts: n/a
    Default

    Maybe you should install nt on its own computer.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply


    Thread Tools Search this Thread
    Search this Thread:

    Advanced Search
    Display Modes

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    vB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Forum Jump



    All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 PM.

    Archive - Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc. Top
    Browse the various sections of the site
    Hardware
    Reviews, Articles, News, All Reviews...
    Gaming
    Reviews, Articles, News...
    Regular Sections
    A Guru's World, CPU/Memory Watch, SLDeals...
    SLBoards
    Forums, Register(Free), Todays Discussions...
    Site Info
    Search, About Us, Advertise...
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc. Legal | Advertising | Site Info