|
SL Newsletter
|
| Recieve bi-weekly updates on news, new articles, and more |
|
|
|
|

12-18-00, 09:37 PM
|
 |
ActiveTuning Partner
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: University Of Maryland
Posts: 1,873
|
|
|

12-21-00, 02:01 AM
|
 |
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 230
|
|
Gosh.. too many to list!
- Calder OpenLinux eServer 2.3
- Slackware 4, 7, and 7.1
- SuSE 6.3
- Stormix 1 + 2
- Mandrake 6
- Redhat 5.2
I think my favorite at the moment depends on what i'm using it for. I've been quite impressed by Stormix 2 when used as a desktop workstation. For server uses, Caldera eServer seems to be more 'ready-to-go out of the box'.. which can be quite comforting to people that need a stable box up and running quickly.
I don't know if I can really name my 'favorite' distro though.. I mean, Linux is Linux.. but It is the small things that count, and make each one different.
Ryan
------------------
Devnut.com - ( Discussion Forums)
Developer resources for the caffiene dependent..
|

12-21-00, 07:08 PM
|
 |
ActiveTuning Partner
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: University Of Maryland
Posts: 1,873
|
|
|

12-21-00, 09:21 PM
|
 |
SLCentral.com Staff Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: tampa,fl,usa
Posts: 719
|
|
I'm with Devnut. Tried all those, but add the Redhat 6.1 to that as well.
Keep coming back to Mandrake, though!
------------------
|

12-23-00, 01:46 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Savannah, GA USA
Posts: 8
|
|
Debian, RedHat, Mandrake, Finnix, Corel, Stormix, SuSE, and TurboLinux. My favorite would be Mandrake and SuSE in workstation config, and TurboLinux in server config.
|

12-23-00, 09:53 AM
|
 |
Known As The VillageIdiot
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Princeton, NJ, USA
Posts: 110
|
|
Dave setup one of the first versions of Linux when it was just released on my computer, for a review on TheNewOS.com, which, seems to be gone. I have no clue what version that was though, so I am not much help, am I?
------------------
--Daniel--
EMusicTalk.com
|

12-23-00, 02:40 PM
|
 |
ActiveTuning Partner
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: University Of Maryland
Posts: 1,873
|
|
|

01-15-01, 08:34 PM
|
 |
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 230
|
|
Yeah.. I would have to say that Mandrake isn't anywhere near the first distro.. (more like slackware..)
Dave, more about eServer:
It's, as I said, really to get going out of the box. If you're brand spankin new to linux.. (well.. somewhat experienced..), and want to get a stable server up and going quickly; this is the way to go.
They make it extremely simple to manage your daemons, and come with all the base (expected) server software preinstalled. The one downside, is that unlike some of the bigger distro's (Debian/Stormix, Redhat, etc..) they don't have an 'auto-update' (or auto-install for that matter..) feature, which makes package isntallation/updates quite a bit easier.
It's wothwhile to look at..
Ryan
------------------
Devnut.com - ( Discussion Forums)
Developer resources for the caffiene dependent..
|

01-15-01, 08:50 PM
|
|
|
Slackware 7.1, Madrake 7.2, Caldera OpenLinux eDesktop 2.4, RedHat 6.something
RedHat and Caldera were ok, I absolutely hated Mandrake and I still have Slackware installed
|

01-17-01, 05:57 AM
|
|
|
i have used :
-red hat 5.2
-suse 5.0
-debian 2.2
and well debian is the better i have tried because of easy update.
And debian doesn't install a lot of utils you don't need. You have to select the one you want.
Look at http://www.debian.org
|

01-18-01, 06:43 PM
|
|
|
Redhat
Corel
Switched to BeOS - much happier now.
|

01-24-01, 08:50 PM
|
|
|
Linux Mandrake 7.0, 7.1, 7.2
oh, yeah and LFS-> build it yourself

|

02-19-01, 09:01 PM
|
 |
Dancing Hero
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Over there
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Well...
Slackware 4
Red Hat 5.0, 6.1, 6.2
Caldera OpenLinux 2.2
SuSE 6.1, 6.3, 6.4
Mandrake 6.0, 7.0
Corel 1.1
Doesn't really count, but also FreeBSD v4.
My roomie's a big fan of Red Hat-based *nixes and hates Debian-like Linuxes, but oddly enough, on three different machines, the only one I've REALLY gotten up and running properly was Slackware. :-D
__________________
"And knowing is half the battle!"
|

02-19-01, 11:30 PM
|
 |
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 230
|
|
I could see why someone would favor the 'Redhat' styled distros.. since they tend to be slightly more user friendly. With that, though, often (in my opinion) come compromises.
I mean... dist's like SuSE, Slack, and Debian are much more well known for being robust (generally speaking) than the lighter (workstation-oriented) versions.
Though I haven't yet used it, i've heard horrible things about RH7.. (by veteran linux users at least.) Even linus torvalds smashed it.. hehe..
Ryan
|

02-20-01, 02:20 PM
|
 |
Dancing Hero
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Over there
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Yup...that's why I haven't even touched RH7. Actually, my roomie owns more Linuxes (Linuces?) than I can count on both hands. I don't really know why he repeatedly plunks down $30-$50 on each distro pack. Maybe he's just supporting the industry. As far as what he owns (Not downloaded, but paid for):
Suse 6.1, 6.4
Red Hat 6.2
Mandrake 7.2
Corel 1.1
What I own:
Mandrake 6.0
Red Hat 5.0
Caldera OpenLinux 2.2
__________________
"And knowing is half the battle!"
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:34 AM.
Hardware
Reviews, Articles, News, All Reviews...
|
Gaming
Reviews, Articles, News...
|
 |
|
|
Regular Sections
A Guru's World, CPU/Memory Watch, SLDeals...
|
 |
SLBoards
Forums, Register(Free), Todays Discussions...
|
Site Info
Search, About Us, Advertise...
|
 |
|