Visiontek Xtasy GeForce4 Ti4600 Author: David Pitlyuk Date Posted: March 27th, 2002 SLRating: Bottom Line: The card is fast, no doubt about it, but it may not exactly be cost worthy. It depends on exactly what features you need and if you want bragging rights or not. Article Navigation Introduction/Specs In The Box Board Overview Test Setup 3DMark 2001 SE Quake3 Arena WinXP Bench Evolva Pros & Cons/Conclusion Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >> Discuss This Article

Quake3 Arena

As Quake3 becomes an older benchmark, we're seeing that at lower settings with lower resolutions almost everything peforms very similar, that's why I'm going to pretty much look at the high quality 1600x1200 benchmarks since these really show where things start to differentiate between all of the cards. Once again the the Ti440 is performing less then 10% below the Ti4600, everything else is in pretty much the same sort of range within about 4% or so from the 3DMark scores.

WinXP Bench

Article Options    Post/View Comments    Find Lowest Price    Print This Article    Read/Write User Reviews    E-Mail This Article

Article Navigation Introduction/Specs In The Box Board Overview Test Setup 3DMark 2001 SE Quake3 Arena WinXP Bench Evolva Pros & Cons/Conclusion

	If you liked this review, you may like... Visiontek Xstasy 6964 GeForce3 Ti500 Review Visiontek 5564 Xstasy Everything Review ATI Radeon 7500 Review

Hardware Reviews, Articles, News, All Reviews...	Gaming Reviews, Articles, News...
	Regular Sections A Guru's World, CPU/Memory Watch, SLDeals...
SLBoards Forums, Register(Free), Todays Discussions...	Site Info Search, About Us, Advertise...