Visiontek Xtasy GeForce4 Ti4600
Author: David Pitlyuk
Date Posted: March 27th, 2002
SLRating: SLRating: 8/10
Bottom Line: The card is fast, no doubt about it, but it may not exactly be cost worthy. It depends on exactly what features you need and if you want bragging rights or not.


Visiontek once again is the first GeForce4 card onto the shelves. Visiontek has been dominating the video card market recently, and seems to be only getting better for them as other companies have dropped out of the NVIDIA graphic card market lately. This is allowing Visiontek to take more and more of the market, looks like their decision to bring the video card line out of just OEM and into retail was a smart choice. Another smart decision in my opinion was their choice of names for their cards this time around with the GeForce4 line. In the previous generation, the GeForce3 Titanium series, Visiontek had names like the Visiontek Xtasy 6964…try and guess which card that is (it's the GeForce3 Ti500 by the way). While they did keep their Xtasy line in-tact, the card's name is now just the chip from NVIDIA that they are using. This brings us to the beginning of our review.

Visiontek's first GeForce4 (actual NV25 technology) to be released is the Ti4600 (named the Visiontek Xtasy Ti4600 appropriately), which is in fact the top of the line in graphics technology currently. We will be looking at this card today. Aside from the Ti4600, Visiontek will also have the Ti4400 and Ti4200. We got their Ti4400 card just in time to include it in our benchmarks, so we do have the numbers for the card in this review. Let's now take a look at the Ti4600's specs:



  • Controller: NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
  • Bus Type AGP
  • Memory 128MB DDR
  • Core Clock 300MHz
  • Memory Clock 650MHz DDR memory
  • RAMDAC 350MHz
  • Vertical Refresh See Chart on other side
  • API Support Direct-X®, Open GL ICD® for Windows
  • Connectors VGA, DVI, TV In/Out
  • 1.23 trillion operations/sec.
  • 136 Million triangles/sec setup
  • 10.4GB/second memory bandwidth

Features at a Glance

  • AGP 4x compatible with fast writes
  • 256-bit 3D and 2D graphics accelerator
  • NVIDIA nView™ display technologies
  • Lightspeed Memory Architecture™ II
  • Accuview Antialiasing™
  • High Definition Video Processing Engine
  • TV In/Out connectors
  • DVI connector

Package Contains

  • GeForce4 Ti 4600™ Graphics Accelerator
  • Installation Guide
  • Installation CD
  • Install Guide .pdf
  • Demos
  • Adobe Acrobat Reader™
  • NVIDIA® Unified Driver Architecture
  • Cyberlink PowerDVD™
  • Cyberlink PowerDirector


  • IBM PC or 100% Compatible
  • 266 MHz or higher CPU (AMD K6-2
  • Intel Pentium II or higher)
  • AGP 2.0 Compliant Socket
  • CD ROM drive
  • Windows 95 OSR2, 98, ME, NT 4.0, 2000, XP 64MB of RAM

In The Box

As stated in the box, in the box you will find this:

  • GeForce4 Ti 4600 Graphics Accelerator
  • Installation Guide
  • Installation CD
  • Install Guide .pdf
  • Demos
  • Adobe Acrobat Reader
  • NVIDIA Unified Driver Architecture
  • Cyberlink PowerDVD
  • Cyberlink PowerDirector

The on thing that it does not mention is that you will also get a VIVO (Video-In/Video-Out) cable. Right now when you buy the card it shouldn't be in the box because Visiontek did not want to wait for the cable to be completed, but you will get it if you do purchase the card. We got a prototype version of the cable:

The VIVO cable allows you to not only output your video onto something like a TV, but also input your video from any kind of S-Video device. This means that the Ti4600 from Visiontek is essentially a video capture device at the same time. We'll get more into this though in the board overview section of the review.

As Visiontek has done in the past, they pretty much give you the barebones in order to pass on savings to the consumer. They include a quick installation guide on paper, but there is a more detailed guide and video on the CD that is included. They have also bundled Cyberlink's PowerDVD and PowerDirector, but no games. PowerDVD is obviously a DVD player while PowerDirector is a video editing tool since the card does do video capturing.

Board Overview

The first thing I noticed when looking at this card is the size of it. Check out a comparison between the GeForce4 MX440 and the GeForce4 Ti4600:

In fact because of it's size we had some issues putting the video card into our motherboard because there was an audio input in the way on an Intel D850MD. I just pushed it down a little bit and the issue was solved. I remember reading over at HardOCP something about the issue and that Visiontek had moved some capacitors around in order to clear up some of the problems. I'm not 100% sure about this though as it's something I just remember reading a while ago. If anybody can clear this up I will post an update to the review.

The other thing major thing I noticed was the cool looking heatsink from NVIDIA. Visiontek chose to go with NVIDIA's heatsink rather then making and testing their own, this also ends up saving costs for the consumer because they don't need to spend any money on R&D. Under the heatsink is the 300MHz GPU which is manufactured using a 0.15 micron technology. Note that the card gets very hot.


In terms of memory there are 8 chips, 4 on each side of the card. Each of the chips are 2.8ns 16MB and made by Samsung. The default clock is set at 650MHz which means that this is the first consumer card to break the 10GB memory bandwidth barrier. Also note that the memory chips do not have heatsinks on them like previous generations of NVIDIA cards. The reason is because of the difference between QFP memory (GeForce2/3) and BPA (GeForce4) memory.

You will also notice this Philips SAA7108E encoder/decoder:

This chip allows the Xtasy Ti4600 to do the video-in/video-out with the VIVO cable I spoke about earlier. This brings me to my next point, the card offers the NVIDIA Personal Cinema support we talked about in our Xtasy Everything review we did a while back. Although note that the card does not work with the Personal Cinema's breakout box, which means there are no TV-Tuner capabilities. We were told that Visiontek was looking at doing an NV25 or NV17 based Xtasy Everything based on the Personal Cinema this year.

Something new that you will notice on the card is multi-monitor support, aka nView. Like ATI's Hydravision technology, nView is very similar in terms of how it is used, in fact, it's made by the same company. I personally think that nView is even easier to use then Hydravision.

If you see the back of the card here you will notice that there is a DVI-I and HD-15 connector. In order to run to monitors that use HD-15 you will need an adapter that can convert DVI-I to HD-15, it looks like this:

Just a quick note, this adapter comes with Radeon video cards...Visiontek does not include it. So if you need one you'll have to pay extra, even though they are fairly cheap.

Test Setup

Processor Intel Pentium 4 2GHz Socket 478
Motherboard Intel D850MD
Memory 256MB PC800 Samsung RDRAM
Hard Drive IBM Deskstar 30GB 75GXP 7200RPM ATA100
Video Card(s) Visiontek GeForce4 Ti4600
Visiontek GeForce4 Ti4400
Visiontek GeForce4 MX440
Visiontek Xstasy 6964 GeForce3 Ti500
Visiontek Xstasy 6564 GeForce3 Ti200
Visiontek GeForce3
ATI Radeon 8500 64MB
ATI Radeon 7500
Elsa Gladiac GeForce2 Ultra 64MB
Visiontek Xstasy 5864 GeForce2 Ti
Leadtek Winfast GeForce2 GTS
Visiontek GeForce2 MX400 64MB
CD-ROM Sony CDU-5211 52X
Ethernet On-Board
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Video Drivers NVIDIA Detonator XP v24.72
  Benchmarking Applications
Applications Quake III Arena - Demo Four
3DMark 2001 SE
WinXP Bench

3DMark 2001 SE

Here we see the GeForce4 Ti4x00 series sweep everything by far. The Ti4600 and Ti4400 ran pretty close to each other. Keep in mind that the Ti4400 retails $100 less then the Ti4600. In terms of the previous generation comparison, the Ti4600 runs about 20-25% faster then the GeForce3 Ti500 and about 33% faster then the GeForce3 at 1600x1200. In comparison to ATI, at 1600x1200 the Ti4600 was about 22% faster, but keep in mind we benchmarked the 64MB flavor of the card, not the 128MB which was recently announced.

Quake3 Arena

As Quake3 becomes an older benchmark, we're seeing that at lower settings with lower resolutions almost everything peforms very similar, that's why I'm going to pretty much look at the high quality 1600x1200 benchmarks since these really show where things start to differentiate between all of the cards. Once again the the Ti440 is performing less then 10% below the Ti4600, everything else is in pretty much the same sort of range within about 4% or so from the 3DMark scores.

WinXP Bench

This is a new benchmark that we've added to test cards with. XPBench is specifically designed to query which Windows XP feautures your video card/driver combination supports, and then demonstrate the performance improvements and level of support for the features of the Windows XP GUI.

We can see here that the Ti4600 really dominates everything. Note the ATI cards which are much lower then any NVIDIA card, looks like ATI needs some work on their Windows XP drivers.


The results for the Evolva test are pretty surprising as the Radeon 8500 gets a big boost and performs up there with the big guys, only 5% shy of the Ti4600 and about 6.5% better then the GeForce3 Ti500 in the bumpmapped test. The Ti4400 performs only 2% slower then the Ti4600, a difference that we doubt you could tell.

Pros & Cons


  • The fastest thing out there
  • Video capture capabilities
  • nView multi-monitor support


  • Expensive
  • Card is big, but isn't an issue to everybody
  • No DVI-I to HD-15 connector included


The Visiontek Xtasy Ti4600 is the fast. Period. The big question is if it is cost effective or not. This seems like repeat of the whole GF3 Ti500 Vs. GF3 Ti200 competition, but in my opinion there is a closer rivalry between the Ti4400 and Ti4600. The Ti4400 performed almost always only less then 10% worse then the Ti4600, is a 10% performance gain worth $100 to you?

Of course there are other differences between the cards like the VIVO capabilities on the Ti4600 as well as the bundled video editing software. You have to ask yourself if that is something you really need. The other difference is that the Ti4600 uses 2.8ns memory while the Ti4400 uses 3.2ns memory. Remember that the memory on the Ti4600 is clocked at 650MHz, but because it's 2.8ns, it should technically be able to get up to 715MHz or close to it without much problem.

One of the cons was that there was no DVI-I to HD-15 connector included, I don't think it would have been too expensive for Visiontek to add this in and would have really promoted the fact that the card has multi-monitor support, instead if you want the feature with two non-DVI monitors, you will have to go and pick the connector up yourself, a hassle if you ask me.

Overall, Visiontek has a winner on their hands and was once again first to market. Look for a more in-depth look at their Ti4400 card coming soon at SL if you are pondering between the two cards, but if you want the fastest thing out there and bragging rights, go and get this card.

SLRating: 8/10