 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
FIC A96P Radeon 9600 Pro Review
Author: Jakester
Date Posted: July 29th, 2003
| SLRating: |
 |
|
|
Bottom Line: Overall, the A96P is an excellent card with great overclocking ability. Will it give you the maximum amount of performance for your money, read on to find out in our official review....
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
>> Discuss This Article |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Video Game Benchmarks:
Now lets take a look at how the cards perform
when the time calls for some fraggin'! Lets start it off with the infamous
UT2K3 benchmarks in D3D (Direct 3D). For the UT2K3 benchmarks we used
HardOcp's UT Benchmark utility v2.1. The
following information about the utility's "High Quality" test is posted on their
website to explain what they've done- take a look....
It should be mentioned that the "High Quality" test which was used within
this utility loads an INI file which automatically forces the maximum detail and
quality settings available within the game with some additional enhancements.
Specifically ( from the utility's FAQ ):
For the
MaxDetail.ini I made the following changes:
[D3DDrv.D3DRenderDevice]
DetailTexMipBias= -0.8
DefaultTexMipBias= -0.8
UseTripleBuffering=True
UseCompressedLightmaps=False
(We felt that slightly more aggressive LOD would both
sharpen image quality and increase the demand slightly for the highest detail
quality setting.)
One thing to note is that V-Sync has been
disabled on all three cards, now lets begin.


OpenGL:


The results remain quite similar to the previous ones with the 9700 out in
the lead and the FX5600 and A96P battling it out to claim the best
cost-efficient graphics card in all the land- well at least in this review.
Before we end the game benchmarks lets take a look at another popular benchmark-
Comanche 4.


With the results in, it appears that while all three cards obviously decrease
in performance as the AA and resolutions are increased, the 9600 and 9700
decrease much slower than the FX5600. In every game-benchmark the 9600 is the
clear victor over the FX5600 and at a lesser cost. I think its clear which of
the two cards wins the award for most cost-efficient graphics card. Next up is
one of my personal favorites.
Hardware
Reviews, Articles, News, All Reviews...
|
Gaming
Reviews, Articles, News...
|
 |
|
|
Regular Sections
A Guru's World, CPU/Memory Watch, SLDeals...
|
 |
SLBoards
Forums, Register(Free), Todays Discussions...
|
Site Info
Search, About Us, Advertise...
|
 |
|