SLCentral - Your logical choice for computing and technology
Latest Deals   
Various options regarding this article
Discuss This Article
Print This Article

Navigation
  • Home
  • Search
  • Forums
  • Hardware
  • Games
  • Tech News
  • Deals
  • Prices
  • A Guru's World
  • CPU/Memory Watch
  • Site Info
  • Latest News
    Corsair TX750W Power Supply Unit Review
    Businesses For Sale
    Shure E530PTH Earphones Review
    Guide to HDTVs
    Cheap Web Hosting
    >> Read More
    Latest Reviews
    Corsair TX750W Power Supply Unit - 4-/-0/2008
    Shure E530PTH Earphones - 9-/-0/2007
    Suunto T6 Wrist Top Computer - 1-/-0/2007
    Suunto X9i Wristwatch - 9-/-0/2006
    Shure E3g Earphones - 5-/-0/2006
    >> Read More
    SL Newsletter
    Recieve bi-weekly updates on news, new articles, and more


    Raidmax RX-520XP PSU
    Author: jonnyguru
    Date Posted:17/03/2005 10:07.18
    SLRating: SLRating: 8/10
    Bottom Line: There's more to picking a PSU than the wattage, as explained in the first of a series of forthcoming PSU reviews.

    Find the lowest price for this product
    Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    Discuss This Article


    Parameters

    So what will I be testing?

    I will be throwing five tests at each power supply.

    Test number one is the Zero Load test.  This will be performed with no load on the power supply other than the internal load the power supply provides itself to function, the load of any fans that may be installed and running in the power supply and an artificial 5V stand by load of 2A.

    The data gathered on this test will be:

    • 12V voltage
    • 5V voltage
    • 3.3V voltage
    • Efficiency
    • Power Factor

    After this test is performed, the load tests will begin starting with a synthetic load representative of three builds

    The first build is a a pretty common representation of a PC found today.  Heavier on the 12V than PC's of the past and lower on the 5V than PC's of the past.  We used a Pentium 4 3.2 Northwood, an AGP video card, 1GB of DDR RAM, two hard drives, two optical drives and three case fans. For fun, we threw four USB devices on the machines just to get the 5V load up over 30A.

    This is what we came up with:

    • 12V = 19.8
    • 5V = 16A
    • 3.3V = 3A

    So we made our load specs for this build....

    • 12V = 20A
    • 5V = 20A
    • 3.3V = 3A

    This next load test was based on an Athlon XP 3200+ on a Biostar M7NCD Ultra 400 motherboard, an AGP card, 512MB of PC2700 RAM, two hard drives, two optical drives and two case fans. 

    The estimated maximum load for the build was:

    • 12V = 7.1A
    • 5V = 32.4A
    • 3.3V = 2.4A

    To make worst case scenario even worse, we made the load specs this:

    • 12V = 10A
    • 5V = 30A
    • 3.3V = 3A

    The last build is sort of gonzo.  We built a Pentium 4 3.4E Prescott with two 6800 Ultra PCI Express video cards, two hard drives, two optical drives, 1GB of RAM, three case fans and came up with:

    • 12V = 31.8A
    • 5V = 16A
    • 3.3V = 2.4A

    When I replaced the Prescott with an AMD64 3400+, I had enough ceiling to run four hard drives in a RAID-5 array with room to spare.  So we decided the load test for this configuration should be:

    • 12V = 30A
    • 5V = 20A
    • 3.3V = 3A

    We also took the power supply's temperature at this load.

    Now, all of these builds had USB mice and keyboards as well as floppy, NIC... the standard fare.   Whether 512MB or 1GB of RAM were used, this was always done by using two sticks of RAM, which is why the voltage demand never really changed on any of the builds.  Naturally, if you had more sticks of RAM, you'd have more of a load on that rail.

    This is what we're looking for with each of the above four tests:

    • 12V voltage
    • 5V voltage
    • 3.3V voltage
    • Efficiency
    • Power Factor

    That's right.  Same as the Zero load test! I just wanted to make sure you were paying attention. ;-)

    We also took a look at the label and cranked the 12V and 5V up to maximum specs as per the PSU's label.  We then did the math: (3.3+5V Combined Maximum)-(5V * Maximum Amperage)=(3.3V Testing Amperage Setting) and set the 3.3V accordingly. 

    At the point where we cranked up the 5V and 12V to label spec, we were usually already beyond the power supply's maximum wattage rating, so it wasn't unusual for a power supply's overload protection to kick in if we tried to compensate a little extra 3.3V.  This is why it ticks me off when a review site says "we ran the power supply at maximum load" but doesn't break down how the rails were loaded.  It's a given you can't load a power supply to "maximum load" if you juice up each rail, so one is left wondering where "maximum load" really is.

    This also brings me to the "power supply blowing up" scenario and what it means to me and my tests.  If overload protection trips, that's good.  I actually rely on overload protection to kick in to effectively test a power supply.  If I run a power supply with a 12V load of 20A and the rail is only rated at 16A and overload protection kicks in, then no big deal.  I'm over spec.  I write down that the power supply failed the test and move on to the next test.  This is also how I do the max load test.  I set the 12V and 5V to the maximum on the label and then raise the 3.3V until overload protection kicks in.  When it kicks in, I lower the 3.3V and cycle the power on the power supply.  If the overload protection fails to function, the power supply blows up.  This does not mean that the power supply is inherently a fire hazard.  It means I received a defective unit.  Unfortunately, it also means the testing process comes to a screeching halt.

    When everything is said and done, I lower the load back down to test two and wait for one minute for the power supply to cool down.  We then cut the power off and watch the Compu-Nurse.  After one minute, an idle temperature is taken.

    How will the tests be performed?

    I'll be honest... I don't have three builds I can switch power supplies in and out of. Quite frankly, I don't have the time to do this that way either!

    For testing power supplies, I am in possession of a SunMoon SM-268, a power supply load tester, and a little Weibo PF1211, which is a mains efficiency reader similar to a Kill A Watt, but easier to read because Volts, Amps, Watts and Power Factor are all displayed on four LED's simultaneously, instead of having to click through one LCD to get all pertinent information.  Despite my wife's best attempts to convince me to set up elsewhere, the lab is in the dining room.



    Next Page Go the the next page
    Article Options

    Post/View Comments   Post/View Comments
    Print this article   Print This Article
    Article Navigation

    1. Introduction
    2. Wattage
    3. Parameters
    4. Methodology
    5. RX-520XP
    6. Observations
    7. Overview
    8. Results/Conclusion

    If you liked this review, you may like...

    Ultra Wizard ATX Case

    Thermaltake Xaser Series Full tower ATX Cases

    CMI BMW Style Mid-Tower ATX Case


    Browse the various sections of the site
    Hardware
    Reviews, Articles, News, All Reviews...
    Gaming
    Reviews, Articles, News...
    Regular Sections
    A Guru's World, CPU/Memory Watch, SLDeals...
    SLBoards
    Forums, Register(Free), Todays Discussions...
    Site Info
    Search, About Us, Advertise...
    Copyright 1998-2007 . All Rights Reserved. Tuesday 16th January 2018 08:54 PM Legal | Advertising | Site Info